The Plastic Whale
‘Joy cometh in the
morning’ scripture tells us, I hope so, I truly do. However, sometimes joy doesn’t
always arrive. This rainy Saturday morning is an atypical case of this, in
which I awakened to the distressing news story of the stranded ‘plastic whale’ which
had died from the ingestion of plastic debris. After sombrely drinking some coffee
and getting ready, while staring at the rainy clouds representing archetypal pathetic fallacy, I thought it would be wise to spend the day learning about the role of
plastic pollutants within our marine environments. This week’s blog therefore,
is centred around the negative implications of plastic within our global marine
environments.
I hear you ask, what is
marine plastic pollution?
The presence of plastic pollution within our marine environments has become
an internationally recognised environmental issue since the early 1970s,
following the emergence of seminal research from Carpenter and Smith (1972). The findings
indicated the presence of high plastic concentrations among sea surfaces and
the ingestion of plastic among fish species. The seminal text offered a future
prediction at the time, implicating the relationship between disposability
and production would result in increased plastic pollution across marine
environments (do Sul and Costa, 2014). Global plastic abundance today stands at
5.25 trillion pieces, equivalent to 720 items for each member of the entire global
population (Worm et al., 2017). Controversy remains across the empirical literature
regarding the exact volume of plastic that will enter marine environments in
the foreseeable future (do Sul and Costa, 2014; Li et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).
Nonetheless, there is recognition that plastic debris has entered and contaminated
global marine ecosystems, providing sustained and long-term damage (Wang et al., 2016). A comprehensive study from Gall and Thompson (2015) found 92% of ingested
and entanglement incidents for marine organisms, from over 340 publications, was
solely linked with plastic debris causes.
Plastic sources
though?
Land and ocean-based sources contribute towards the source of plastic
within our marine environments (Li et al., 2016). Plastic debris derived from land-based sources has
accounted for 80% of the total plastic debris located within marine
environments (Jambeck et al., 2015). These land-based sources often involve
coastal urban centres and industrialised areas which are paradigmatically
linked with high disposability
of plastic products, notably plastic bag usage (Li et al., 2016). The transport
routes of plastic debris to marine environments involve passages though river systems and following treatment at wastewater processing
centres (Cole et al., 2011). Moreover, land-sourced plastic debris is often transported
following the occurrence of weather events, including extreme flooding, which
helps to dispose plastic debris towards the sea (Naidoo et al., 2015). Inversely, ocean-based sources make up the
remaining 20% of plastic debris within global marine environments (Li et al., 2016). Ocean-based sources are focused around commercial fishing, in which discarding of plastic netting and fishing equipment contributes towards marine environment contamination (Worm et al., 2017). Conservative economic estimates indicate financial damage of plastic debris within global marine environments is
potentially $13 billion annually (Nairobi, 2014; Wang et al., 2016).
The temporal accumulation of plastics within
marine environments involves contributions from macro-plastic and micro-plastic sources (Wang et al., 2016). Smaller plastic sizes, involving
micro-plastics debris, are able to infiltrate environments more effectively,
while inversely macro-plastic debris have to undergo a process of fragmentation
before successfully infiltrating environments (Barnes et al., 2009). Previous blogposts have helped to address varying definitions
of plastic debris.
Distribution:
The distribution of plastic globally remains idiosyncratic
and uneven, with plastic debris being collated within Arctic sea ice and the
equator regions (Jambeck et al., 2015). A concentration of plastic pollution has
been noted around coastlines and urban centres globally (Wang et al., 2016; Worm et al., 2017). Open ocean gyres have also been indicated as hotspots of plastic
debris (Lebreton et al., 2012).
Oceanographic models have observed that plastic debris can
rapidly be transported on a global scale, with research suggesting debris from
the East Coast of the United States can be transported and relocated to the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre in a
time-span of less than 60 days (Law et al., 2010).
Figure 1: A
manta ray and a green sea turtle at Oahu beach, surrounded by various macro-plastic
and micro-plastic debris (Source: Photographer: John Johnson, National Geographic).
Macro-plastic pollution:
Macro-plastic
debris within marine environments, including freshwater lakes and oceans, poses
various physical hazard implications for marine organisms (Li et al., 2016).
Macro-plastic debris is documented to pose negative implications for marine organisms
following the risk from entanglement and ingestion of plastic
debris (Worm et al., 2017). A study
examining the regions of Australia, Indonesia, and Papua
New Guinea found commercial fishing nets resulted in over 15,000
turtle species being entangled annually (Wilcox et al., 2015; Worm et al., 2017).
Entanglement from plastic debris can induce hindered movement, disrupted feeding patterns and death in extreme cases for marine species (Gall and Thompson, 2015).
The
risk of ingestion is one the most prevalent environmental implications derived
from macro-plastic debris (Fendall and Sewell, 2009). The rate of plastic ingestion has been found in some species to have
increased over the last 30 years, with the review from Schuyler et al., (2014) implicating plastic ingestion
among green turtles has proportionally increased by 20% between the years of
1985 to 2012. Macro-plastic ingestion among marine organisms has
been recognised to cause internal blockages of the intestines and the inability
of species to reproduce (Nelms et al., 2015). Moreover, macro-plastic debris
ingestion has been indicated to seldom induce lowered food consumption among
marine organisms (Li et al., 2016). Future blogs will examine the repercussions
of micro-plastic debris pollution on marine organisms.
Figure 2: Distribution of marine plastics (Source: Eriksen et al., 2014)
Solutions:
Building from last week’s blog, which highlighted the need for an economic paradigm
shift towards ‘doughnut economics’ (Raworth, 2017), interesting solutions are
examined from Li et al., (2016) regarding the emergence de novo tailored solutions to tackle plastic pollution within our marine environments. One such policy solution debated was the
establishment of an international protocol, in which collective governments
become signatories to constrain and mitigate plastic pollution within our
marine environments (Worm et al., 2017). Nonetheless, similarly to the COP21 climate agreement, there are obvious debates regarding asymmetrical merits and
impacts of such a policy imposition for developing countries. Developing
countries, including China and Vietnam, have been recognised as integral
sources of plastic debris for marine environments, contributing an estimated 50%
of global pollution (Tibbetts, 2015). The asymmetrical nature is heightened when examining that
developing countries often mismanage plastic waste compared
to developed countries, highlighted with India mismanaging
88% of plastic waste compared with the United States whereby only 2% is mismanaged
(Worm et al., 2017).
Careful consideration is therefore, needed towards
an international protocol policy which seeks to avoid Western impositions on
developing countries but equally provides a comprehensive agreement to mitigate
against plastic pollution within our marine environments.
Finally, if you want to become involved in the protection of marine environments
or want to receive regular updates, I highly recommend joining the Sky Campaign Appeal!
That’s all folks, hope you have a brilliant
reading week!
Hi Miles!
ReplyDeleteReally interesting post. I am shocked at the facts and figures on marine plastics, I did not realise the true extent of the problem. I am also intrigued to know more about micro-plastic debris - I have never really thought about the detrimental effects of such small pieces of plastic and how you said this could infiltrate the environment more effectively. Could this be a huge risk to the food we eat?
Katie :)
Hello Katie!! Thank you so much for commenting on this blog post! Plastics appear to present an unprecedented threat to our marine environments, with the recent studies from Jambeck et al., (2015) and Worm et al., (2017) presenting a worrying outlook for the future! The dangers posed from plastic within our food are still being investigated, with research remaining in its infancy. However, recent evidence to emerge from Van Cauwenberghe and Janssen (2014), helps suggest that for shellfish lovers, over 11,000 plastic fragments maybe ingested over the course of a year. Below is the article, if you want a quick browse into the potential risk of human ingestion of plastics:
Deletehttp://www.ecotox.ugent.be/microplastics-bivalves-cultured-human-consumption
Also, I found a brief Guardian article which helps examine the potential risk of plastic ingestion:
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/feb/14/sea-to-plate-plastic-got-into-fish
Finally, from our own Global Environmental Change class I found a brilliant blog post, which covers the risk of plastic ingestion:
http://ourplasticocean.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/from-sea-to-plate.html
My apologies about the lateness of my response to this comment!
Miles
Hi Miles!
ReplyDeleteThis was a very illuminating yet sad read. I found that it was really well written and illustrated though! Well done for some great work :) Do you think that the current innovations relative to reducing plastic / providing alternatives and other inventions like the season could realistically tackle the issue, if scaled up?
Alice
Hello Alice!
DeleteThank you so much for you kind comments! :) I agree with your question, I do believe it's possible for local community-based initiatives to be scaled upwards for tackling the plastic pollution endemic with environments.
Notable solutions include the examples of Aberporth and Modbury:
http://www.cambrian-news.co.uk/article.cfm?id=118145&headline=Aberporth%20aiming%20to%20be%20first%20plastic-free%20village%20in%20Wales§ionIs=news&searchyear=2017
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2007/may/12/uknews.waste
Moreover, I think we need to focus upon harmonising community-scale initiatives in conjunction, with improved awareness, regulation, and restrictions from the Government to tackle the plastic crisis!
Asante
Miles